Hi Peter, On Nov 12, 4:54 pm, Peter Bonivart <shuttle...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, I'm the author of pkgutil, I'm glad you're about to support it in > Puppet since I get quite many requests for that. It's nice you chip in here! We appreciate it. > I think the issue with "Not installed" vs. "notinst" is probably from > converting the pkg-get provider, if I'm not mistaken pkg-get prints > "Not installed" so that should just be "notinst" instead. I'm thinking > about adding an option for machine parseable output to make these > things better. Pachine parseable output would be very nice, but in my opinion not that 'urgent'. We can parse it like it is. > I have changed the exit code to 0 (Rudy#10). Nice. From which version would this be? An other issue that we need to tackle is which version(s) of pkgutil will we support with the puppet provider? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
