On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 07:21:33 -0800 Nigel Kersten wrote: > On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 7:15 AM, Arnau Bria <arnaub...@pic.es> wrote: > > On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 12:55:38 +0100 > > Arnau Bria wrote: > > > >> Hi all, > >> modulepath=/etc/puppet/manifests/modules:/etc/puppet/manifests/modules/common:/etc/puppet/manifests/services/workernode/modules/ > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > > > > this is wrong. /modules/common overwrites /modules and modules not > > under /modules/common are not visible. > > Wrong how? I'm unsure how we behave when you specify two overlapping > locations:
from my tests, if: > /etc/puppet/manifests/modules/my_module1 > /etc/puppet/manifests/modules/common/my_module2 my_module1 is not seen and gives the error about missing classes. But my_module2 works fine. > but the bit you've underlined isn't necessarily wrong. We absolutely > support multiple modulepaths separated by ":". yes... and for that reason, if /etc/puppet/manifests/services/workernode/modules/my_moudle3 exists, my_module3 is seen. > I would suggest avoiding the overlapping filesystem locations and see > if that resolves the issue. that's exactly what I've done. maybe my explanation was really short and confusing :-) > > > > Cheers, > > Arnau cheers, Arnau -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
