On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 4:35 AM, Vagn Scott <vagnsc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Puppet already has stage[ Main ] which is the only > stage it needs to define. All other stages > can be defined relative to main and each other, and should > be a matter of convention. This is true, but only if you don't care about sharing your puppet code with anyone else, or consuming anyone else's code. Say I build a module to set up a service that requires installing libraries, laying down package repos, installing packages, and setting up a service. You can't use stages for this in your module, because there are no conventions around stages other than [main] that you can rely existing in deployments other than your own. > So I think it would be more > fruitful to talk about the purpose of stages, along with > their proposed names. > As the OP, I'm going to say that I'm really interested in hearing about this, but please start another thread :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
