On 10 October 2011 13:05, Jonathan Gazeley <jonathan.gaze...@bristol.ac.uk>wrote:
> On 08/10/11 21:22, Chris Phillips wrote: > >> What better way to monitor the puppet runs than by executing that run as >> part of the check? >> > > I assume your Nagios plugin execution timeout must be insanely long? :) > > In the past I have considered using Nagios for things other than > monitoring, and likewise using Puppet for things other than configuration. > On both counts I decided it was probably best to set a boundary and not > wilfully abuse these tools, since it's likely to go wrong sooner or later! > In my organisation we use Nagios only to monitor, and Puppet only to > configure. > > always done within 30 seconds, and it's not like if it took longer on an occasional rollout it would impact puppet at all, temporarily messy as the monitor results might be. fundamentally though, with cron or puppetd being trivial simple, i'm more than happy to be doing it this way. Chris -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
