Puppet is worth it just for mere dint of the fact of centralized control of SSH 
keys 

Go Puppet go!


--Stuart

Via Apple iPhone 4S on the AT&T Wireless Network


On Jul 27, 2012, at 10:58 AM, Nikolaos Hatzopoulos <nhat...@gmail.com> wrote:

> My philosophy is that if you implement something would be easy to redo it and 
> produce
> a new key, kind of something nice that puppet has, so the thing that you are 
> suggesting
> with the export it sounds complicated and I wanted to learn what it does 
> because I
> saw it was a new feature,  but as I see it is better to be centralize and 
> produce 
> the keys on the server and distribute them to the nodes.
> 
> thanks for the responds,
> --Nikos
> 
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 2:08 PM, jcbollinger <john.bollin...@stjude.org> 
> wrote:
> 
> 
> On Thursday, July 26, 2012 10:41:28 AM UTC-5, Nikolaos Hatzopoulos wrote:
> as far as I understand for files you need a unique title in my case 
> /etc/mynodes.txt
> 
> how you can export instead of a file a variable and let's say it has a unique 
> "title"
> and it has as content a string can you do that?
> 
> You can only export resources, not variables.  You can, however, export 
> resources of any type, including custom and defined types.  I'm not quite 
> following what you don't like about the approach I've selected so far, but 
> most objectives of this kind can be realized by exporting and collecting 
> resources of some type, if you really want or need to go through Puppet as 
> the intermediary.
>  
> 
> The scp won't work because I am trying to setup the ssh keys with taking the 
> key
> from a specific node and putting into the authorized_keys file of the other 
> :) on the other
> hand I can make the scp for the root user.. but if you do that what's the 
> point of using
> puppet (i have only linux nodes)?
> 
> Not this, actually.  Puppet's main purpose is to serve as a central authority 
> and manager for the configuration of nodes under its purview.  Copying data 
> from one node to another is conflicts with "central authority" because it 
> makes the source node the authority for the information copied.  If you want 
> Puppet only for this purpose, then you probably don't really want Puppet at 
> all.
> 
> A solution more in the Puppet style would be to generate all the keys on the 
> master (possibly, but not necessarily, inside Puppet), and have Puppet 
> distribute them to all parties that need them.
> 
> 
> John
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Puppet Users" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/puppet-users/-/Y0BmPZIkL2cJ.
> 
> To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Puppet Users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to