I interpreted that as using hostnames as hardware names and cnames as
service names, pointing to the h/w the service is running on.
D.
On 13.09.2012 15:58, Nielsen, Steve wrote:
Mike -
Just curious, what do you mean by "using cnames as the maker intended" ? Are
you suggesting a CNAME per hostname mapping?
Thanks,
Steve
Steve Nielsen VP, Open Source Engineering | comScore, Inc.(NASDAQ:SCOR)
o +1 (312) 775-6473 | f +1 (312) 775-6495 | mailto:sniel...@comscore.com
.....................................................................................................
Introducing Mobile Metrix 2.0 - The next generation of mobile behavioral
measurement
www.comscore.com/MobileMetrix
-----Original Message-----
From: puppet-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:puppet-users@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Michael Stahnke
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 12:33 AM
To: puppet-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [Puppet Users] RHEL Kickstart and Puppet certificates
I used to just institute policy that hostnames could not be re-used.
It had a few benefits beyond puppet, like application people not hard-coding
hostnames and using cnames as the maker intended.
Mike
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet
Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet
Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
