----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mohit Chawla" <mohit.chawla.bin...@gmail.com>
> To: puppet-users@googlegroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 10:49:50 PM
> Subject: Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Wrapper classes, ordering & anchors
>
> Weird, the only difference is I didn't define any relationship
> between one, two, three, but made them all depend on wrapper individually,
> and then in the node def, made the wrapper depend on some other class -
> and it didn't work. Probably a bug (2.7.19 client and 2.7.11 server)
> ?
if i change mine to one->wrapper, two->wrapper, three->wrapper it works
fine.
puppet 2.7.17
>
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 3:10 AM, R.I.Pienaar <r...@devco.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Mohit Chawla" <mohit.chawla.bin...@gmail.com>
> >> To: puppet-users@googlegroups.com
> >> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 10:31:28 PM
> >> Subject: Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Wrapper classes, ordering &
> >> anchors
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 2:44 AM, R.I.Pienaar <r...@devco.net>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > i find the anchor pattern both a royal pain and too strict, i
> >> > dont
> >> > generally
> >> > care to bind classes between two resources but instead just
> >> > before
> >> > some
> >> > resource or class
> >> >
> >> > class wrapper {
> >> > include one, two, three
> >> >
> >> > Class["one"] -> Class["two"] -> Class["three"] ->
> >> > Class["wrapper"]
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > at this point 'include wrapper' will have those 3 classes and
> >> > their
> >> > resources completed before anything that requires the wrapper
> >> > class
> >> >
> >> > this is often sufficient enough and satisfies 'just enough
> >> > ordering
> >> > hints'
> >> > to me.
> >>
> >> I suppose this is similar to what Luke suggested, that is:
> >> class wrapper {
> >> include foo
> >> include bar
> >> Class["foo"]->Class["wrapper"]
> >> Class["bar"]->Class["wrapper"]
> >> }
> >>
> >> But that didn't work for me if I tried to make sure some class is
> >> executed before the wrapper class. node x { class xyz;
> >> class["xyz"]->Class["wrapper"] }
> >>
> >> Except that I did not try
> >> Class["foo"]->Class["bar"]->Class["wrapper"]
> >> in the wrapper class ( because there isn't any relationship
> >> between
> >> foo & bar ). So, maybe I am missing something in your approach ?
> >
> > his example should work fine
> >
> > here's a more detailed example with some notifies, i can freely
> > shuffle
> > my classes around in the chaining and it seems to do the right
> > thing
> >
> > http://p.devco.net/213/
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups "Puppet Users" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
> >
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Puppet Users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
