On Wednesday, December 5, 2012 8:47:32 AM UTC-6, R.I. Pienaar wrote: > > > On 5 Dec 2012, at 16:43, jcbollinger <john.bo...@stjude.org <javascript:>> > wrote: > > > Certainly the default osfamily support wouldn't be directly harmful to > users, inasmuch as they can easily ignore or override it, but I > nevertheless urge you to keep it simple. > > > Do you have an alternative default hierarchy you'd prefer? >
As Stefan said, just "common" would be fine, or some similar single, fixed-name file. The backlog of open tickets attests to the fact that PL doesn't really have > enough engineering capacity as it is. > > > Not sure what the relevance is here.. > > I probably shouldn't even have brought it up. My apologies. My point, however, was that new features are not free, even after they are written -- every line of code in Puppet has an ongoing maintenance cost. John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/puppet-users/-/aAqr--P3K9EJ. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
