Gareth/Garret Not sure if it helps, but I've managed to exclude stuff from Coveralls by using simplecov filters...
E.g.: https://github.com/fatmcgav/puppet-glassfish/commit/5f7d40c2257f469a297edd04a7dbac068306b82b Gav On Friday, 7 February 2014 02:51:26 UTC, Garrett Honeycutt wrote: > > On 1/26/14 7:50 AM, Gareth Rushgrove wrote: > > For anyone else who likes writing tests for their puppet manifests, > > I've just added basic code coverage to rspec-puppet: > > > > A blog post here about how to use it: > > > > > http://www.morethanseven.net/2014/01/25/code-coverage-for-puppet-modules/ > > > > I'd be interested in any feedback on how to improve or add to this. > > > > Cheers > > > > Gareth > > > > Gareth, > > Great blog post. I tried this on a module with 100% coverage and notice > that it reports back 50% coverage. After some poking around, found that > it is checking code in spec/fixtures/, the stdlib module actually. There > seems to be an open issue[1] regarding the inability to exclude things. > Curious if you found a work around for testing your code and not the > modules pulled in from .fixtures.yml. > > [1] - https://github.com/lemurheavy/coveralls-public/issues/184 > > BR, > -g > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/f1b6bfb4-32c0-4cf8-a58a-b6871db72211%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
