On Monday, February 17, 2014 9:40:22 PM UTC+1, Trevor Vaughan wrote:

Can you just have Class B 'include' class A and then have the appropriate 
> resources in Class B notify/require what you need from Class A?
>

Wouldn't this create a dependency cycle?

Class B, as I wrote, "requires" class A. I cannot just "include" it.
So the resource (service) contained in class A cannot be notified from a 
resource (file) contained in class B.
Right?

Marco

>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/ff736b23-ade1-4e50-922e-dc150613d92c%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to