I have to use an ENC as there are DB calls to be made to determine which nodes get which SW.
AFAIU hiera can't do this. On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 6:13:42 AM UTC-7, R.I. Pienaar wrote: > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "jcbollinger" <[email protected]> > > To: "puppet-users" <[email protected] <javascript:>> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 1:09:04 PM > > Subject: [Puppet Users] Re: ENC vs manifest - cage match > > > On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 5:44:41 AM UTC-5, JonY wrote: > >> > >> If we throw these two into the octagon.. who wins? If one says "add it" > >> and the other says "remove it".. what do I end up with? > >> > > > > Two techs enter, one tech leaves! > > > > Or not. > > > > I really can't agree with the premise that a winner between those two > can > > be declared in absolute terms, and in any case they are not mutually > > exclusive. > > > > Felix makes an excellent point that Hiera can serve many of the same > > purposes that an ENC can do. When you throw in the possibility of > > providing a custom Hiera back end, I'm prepared to say that anything it > is > > possible to do with an ENC, it is also possible to do with Hiera + > > manifest. Some things may be more *convenient* to do via the ENC > > with the exception of setting the environment from the master side which > ENCs > can do and hiera cant > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/e640e593-257b-4921-9850-a250d72f0cbf%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
