What Trevor said. While I sympathize with everyone who is overwhelmed by the software ecosystem around Puppet, not only would it be wrong to conclude that we should avoid adding more, but choice of programming languages and/or runtime environments do not really contribute to the complexity.
Concerning .NET, as I understood we missed the chance to switch to Go because AIX won't run it. Let's see how soon .NET fares any better, if at all. I won't get my hopes up (although C# would be nice to have). There has been talk of a C++ agent in the future on the list. Its native Windows build will likely be easier to deploy than the current Ruby one. Cheers, Felix On 11/13/2014 03:35 PM, Trevor Vaughan wrote: > > Most of the rest of the components mentioned are completely ancillary > to the Puppet language/core itself. > > Trevor > > On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Brian Morris > <nomadicextre...@gmail.com <mailto:nomadicextre...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > I understand where your desire stems from, but IMHO the core > problem with Puppet right now is that it's already fragmented too > much. > > PE, P-FOSS, Ruby, C, Hiera, MCollective, environments or flat, > Augeas, Powershell, Puppet Dashboard, Foreman, etc., and no clear > vision for any of it. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/5467DB26.9000406%40Alumni.TU-Berlin.de. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
