> Le 21 juil. 2015 à 20:33, Peter Huene <peter.hu...@puppetlabs.com> a écrit :
> > Thus there would be no "eth0:1" in the interfaces list; it would just show up > as the first element in the secondary array. e.g. eth0:1 becomes > eth0.secondary.0, eth0:2 becomes eth0.secondary.1, etc. > > Thoughts on this approach? It would better model the output of command line > tools that don't distinguish interfaces between "iface" and "iface:x". > > Alternatively, we could keep eth0:1 in the list and have a reference to the > primary interface like you suggested. I'm open to either approach. I prefer to have no eth0:1 in the interfaces too, but it can break comptability with legacy code. I'm currently switching to facter 3, so that's not a problem for me, other might disagree. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/6F5D8E9E-DC38-402B-B254-85949A7DDC81%40orange.fr. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
