Hi all!

I've been banging my head against this for the past couple of days and I'm 
pretty stuck.  I've started implementing rspec tests for a class that uses 
a hiera lookup and then uses the looked up value to control part of its 
logic.  A simplified version:

class mytest {
  
     $mycondition = hiera('my::condition')

     if $mycondition {
         ...
     }

}


My spec_helper looks like this:

require 'rubygems'
require 'puppetlabs_spec_helper/module_spec_helper'


RSpec.configure do |c|
  c.hiera_config = 'spec/fixtures/hiera/hiera.yaml'
end

So far, so standard.   What I want to be able to test, obviously, is making 
sure that when $mycondition is true, the resources in the if statement are 
added to the catalog, and if $mycondition is false, they aren't.

So, my spec in spec/classes/mytest_spec.rb looks like this:

require 'spec_helper'

describe 'mytest' do

  let(:node) { 'truecondition' }
  if {
    should compile
  }

end

My hiera.yaml file looks like this:

---
 :backends:
    - yaml
 :yaml:
   :datadir: 'spec/fixtures/hieradata'
 :hierarchy:
   - "%{::fqdn}"

and my spec/fixtures/hieradata/truecondition.yaml looks like this:

---
  my::condition: false


With this setup, my spec class returns an error:

Failures:

  1) mytest should compile into a catalogue
without dependency cycles
     Failure/Error: should compile
       error during compilation: Evaluation Error: Error while evaluating a 
Func
tion Call, Could not find data item my::condition in any Hiera data file
 and no default supplied at 
C:/puppet/mytest/spec/fixtures/modules/mytest/manifests/init.pp:3:22 on 
node truecondition
     # ./spec/classes/mytest_spec.rb:7:in `block (2 levels) in
<top (required)>'

Finished in 0.4212 seconds (files took 2.42 seconds to load)
1 example, 1 failure

Ultimately, I thought I could specify a different context for each state of 
$mycondition: true and false, so my test would look like:


require 'spec_helper'

describe 'mytest' do
   context "with mycondition => true" do
       let(:node) { 'truecondition' }
       if {
            should compile
       }
   end

   context "with mycondition => false" do
       let(:node) { 'falsecondition' }
       if {
            should compile
       }
   end

end

I tried having my contexts set a fact that hiera could use to select which 
yaml file it got data from: didn't work.  I tried having a different 
hiera.yaml file, one for true and one for false, that would load a 
different common.yaml (since common.yaml seems to work, but nothing else), 
and that didn't work.  The example above was the last thing I tried, since 
rspec-puppet is supposed to provide the fqdn fact, so I thought setting the 
node might help it switch. Failure on all sides!

I'm trying to do this because we've tried to write our profiles following 
the practice of doing hiera lookups instead of class parameters, as 
recommended here: 
 http://garylarizza.com/blog/2014/10/24/puppet-workflows-4-using-hiera-in-anger/

At this point, I'm almost ready to throw in the towel.  There has to be 
some way to change what values hiera supplies so I can test all branches of 
my code, but I'm not sure how to do it.  Any suggestions or alternatives 
would be welcome.

Thanks!





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/2d90a983-2ff8-4d78-9261-803d07820b72%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to