previously the ui would allow adding all pools (even the default
ceph-mon pools) as storage. this could lead to issues when users did
use these pools as storage (e.g.: vms missing their disks after a
migration). hence, restrict the pool selector to rbd pools.

fails gracefully by reverting to the previous behavior if a pool has
no application assigned to it.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Sterz <s.st...@proxmox.com>
---
v3: changed the name of the filter function based on alwin antreich's
suggestion

 www/manager6/form/CephPoolSelector.js | 14 ++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/www/manager6/form/CephPoolSelector.js 
b/www/manager6/form/CephPoolSelector.js
index 5b96398d..b98feb54 100644
--- a/www/manager6/form/CephPoolSelector.js
+++ b/www/manager6/form/CephPoolSelector.js
@@ -15,9 +15,17 @@ Ext.define('PVE.form.CephPoolSelector', {
            throw "no nodename given";
        }
 
+       let onlyCephRBDPools = (item) => {
+           let apps = item.data?.applications;
+           return apps === undefined || apps?.rbd !== undefined;
+       };
+
        var store = Ext.create('Ext.data.Store', {
            fields: ['name'],
            sorters: 'name',
+           filters: [
+               onlyCephRBDPools,
+           ],
            proxy: {
                type: 'proxmox',
                url: '/api2/json/nodes/' + me.nodename + '/ceph/pools',
@@ -32,8 +40,10 @@ Ext.define('PVE.form.CephPoolSelector', {
 
        store.load({
            callback: function(rec, op, success) {
-               if (success && rec.length > 0) {
-                   me.select(rec[0]);
+               let filteredRec = rec.filter(onlyCephRBDPools);
+
+               if (success && filteredRec.length > 0) {
+                   me.select(filteredRec[0]);
                }
            },
        });
-- 
2.30.2



_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel

Reply via email to