Am 14/02/2023 um 17:14 schrieb Aaron Lauterer: > Seems like the `osd df tree` call is about 25% slower, plus minus. > > Tested on our AMD test cluster that is currently set up with 3 nodes with 4 > OSDs each. 50k iterations. > > root@jura1:~# ./bench.pl > Rate osd-df-tree osd-tree > osd-df-tree 9217/s -- -27% > osd-tree 12658/s 37% -- > root@jura1:~# ./bench.pl > Rate osd-df-tree osd-tree > osd-df-tree 9141/s -- -25% > osd-tree 12136/s 33% -- > root@jura1:~# ./bench.pl > Rate osd-df-tree osd-tree > osd-df-tree 9940/s -- -23% > osd-tree 12987/s 31% -- > root@jura1:~# ./bench.pl > Rate osd-df-tree osd-tree > osd-df-tree 8666/s -- -20% > osd-tree 10846/s 25% -- > root@jura1:~#
Many thanks for the insight, so significantly more than noise but far from problematic. _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
