Each patch is a different approach for improving the situation and each subset could be applied. Personally, I like common 2/2, because it removes the competition for early ports and IMHO the only one worth considering a full fix, but it is a bit complex.
Another approach (not in the RFC, also could be considered a full fix) would be to opt-in for a higher expire time for migration ports, add a mechanism to remove the reservation and have vm_start_nolock() remove the reservation after it made sure that QEMU got the port. qemu-server: Fiona Ebner (1): partially fix #4501: migration: start vm: move port reservation and usage closer together PVE/QemuServer.pm | 20 ++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) common: Fiona Ebner (2): partially fix #4501: next unused port: bump port reservation expiretime fix #4501: next unused port: work around issue with too short expiretime src/PVE/Tools.pm | 21 +++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) -- 2.39.2 _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel