On 11/21/23 11:55, Fiona Ebner wrote:
Am 21.11.23 um 11:22 schrieb Lukas Wagner:
This patch series adds the 'notification-mode' setting for backup jobs.
It allows users to choose between the 'old-style' notifications
(mail to configured address, directly via a call to sendmail) or
the 'new-style' notification system.

notification-mode has three possible values:
   - legacy-sendmail: Use old system, considering mailto/mailtnotification 
parameters
   - notification-system: Use the new system (always sending a notification, 
irregardless
     of success/failure. The user is supposed to configure filtering/matching in
     notification settings)
   - auto: use old system if mailto is set, or new system if not

This should provide a fix/workaround for the users' reports of
   - double notifications (these happened in case mailto was set to the same 
address
     as root@pam)

Can't we detect and avoid this more easily?

There would be other ways to solve this, yes. I could also deduplicate
email-addresses in the backend - which isn't is as trivial as it sounds, since the 'legacy' mails are sent via separate, temporary target of
type 'sendmail' - so essentially I'd need to have 'cross-target' context
or something alike.


   - notifications always being sent, even if 'mailnotification' is set to 
failure

Can't we just treat 'failure' mode as always defaulting to legacy
sendmail? And properly deprecate the setting, showing a warning/info
that new notification system is not used if set to 'failure' for both
CLI and UI. And maybe not even allow setting it for new jobs/manual backups?

I think an explicit switch here is much more obvious and predictable to the user.

Personally I think we should wait a bit before deprecating/disallowing 'mailto' for new backup jobs. This gives us time to polish the UX of
creating matchers etc. without 'forcing' the user into the new system.

--
- Lukas


_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel

Reply via email to