gave the series a test by creating a system report on my local machine.
looks good and contains usefull additional information. The only thing I am not so sure about, is the memory dimm info (patch 6). Reviewed-By: Aaron Lauterer <a.laute...@proxmox.com> Tested-By: Aaron Lauterer <a.laute...@proxmox.com> On 2024-04-18 11:16, Alexander Zeidler wrote:
to get a first clue for debugging passthrough and similar issues, when no dmesg output has been provided yet. Signed-off-by: Alexander Zeidler <a.zeid...@proxmox.com> --- v2: * move away from dmesg base * only print kernel command line (boot times can be added by another patch) v1: https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/2024-March/062342.html PVE/Report.pm | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/PVE/Report.pm b/PVE/Report.pm index 53ffdcbb..a8c1cab9 100644 --- a/PVE/Report.pm +++ b/PVE/Report.pm @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ my $init_report_cmds = sub { cmds => [ 'hostname', 'date -R', + 'cat /proc/cmdline', 'pveversion --verbose', 'cat /etc/hosts', 'pvesubscription get',
_______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel