On April 19, 2024 12:09 pm, Fiona Ebner wrote: > Am 09.04.24 um 15:25 schrieb Lukas Wagner: >> Bumps/dependencies: >> - proxmox_notify >> - libproxmox-rs-perl/libpve-rs-perl (needs bumped proxmox_notify) >> - libpve-notify-perl (needs bumped >> libproxmox-rs-perl/libpve-rs-perl) >> - pve-ha-manager (needs bumped libpve-notify-perl) >> - pve-manager (needs bumped libpve-notify-perl) >> - proxmox-mail-forward (optional. should not be affected by any >> changes, but I think >> it should be also be bumped for any larger proxmox_notify changes to >> avoid any >> weird hidden regressions due to mismatches of proxmox_notify >> > > Versioned breaks required: > - new pve-cluster will break old pve-manager and old pve-ha-manager > - new libproxmox-rs-perl/libpve-rs-perl will break old pve-cluster > > Still not too sure about putting the templates in > /usr/share/proxmox-ve/, but maybe @Thomas or @Fabian can chime in on that.
without in-depth look at all the changes in this series, I think it would make most sense for the package shipping (most?) templates to "own" the dir where they are shipped. that seems to be pve-manager, so maybe /usr/share/pve-manager would be an okay fit? or, if we want to avoid having "pve-manager" there, we could of course also create /usr/share/pve or /usr/lib/pve or one of those with "proxmox" instead of "pve", and have that owned by pve-manager.. I dislike proxmox-ve - it might not be the case that it is always installed, which means potential pitfalls for such non-standard systems or if we ever make it optional like we did for PMG/PBS (granted, not very likely, but still..) - normally the /usr/share/$package dir should only be used by $package _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel