On 5/17/24 10:31, Fiona Ebner wrote:
Reported in the community forum: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/145723/post-664612Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner <f.eb...@proxmox.com> --- PVE/CLI/pve7to8.pm | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/PVE/CLI/pve7to8.pm b/PVE/CLI/pve7to8.pm index b34c8362..8443f1fb 100644 --- a/PVE/CLI/pve7to8.pm +++ b/PVE/CLI/pve7to8.pm @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ sub check_pve_packages { }# FIXME: better differentiate between 6.2 from bullseye or bookworm- my ($krunning, $kinstalled) = (qr/6\.(?:2\.(?:[2-9]\d+|1[6-8]|1\d\d+)|5)[^~]*$/, 'proxmox-kernel-6.2'); + my ($krunning, $kinstalled) = (qr/6\.(?:2\.(?:[2-9]\d+|1[6-8]|1\d\d+)|5|8)[^~]*$/, 'proxmox-kernel-6.2'); if (!$upgraded) { # we got a few that avoided 5.15 in cluster with mixed CPUs, so allow older too ($krunning, $kinstalled) = (qr/(?:5\.(?:13|15)|6\.2)/, 'pve-kernel-5.15');
wouldn't it be more future proof to just check if the kernel is a -pve one and the version is higher (or equal) than what was shipped in pve7 ?
i guess the same thing will happen for pve8to9 sooner or later... _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
