On 8/4/25 16:12, Daniel Kral wrote: > Signed-off-by: Daniel Kral <[email protected]> > --- > ha-manager.adoc | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/ha-manager.adoc b/ha-manager.adoc > index 5d75287..e18a14d 100644 > --- a/ha-manager.adoc > +++ b/ha-manager.adoc > @@ -787,6 +787,11 @@ HA resources `vm:101` and `vm:102` are each in a > positive resource affinity > rule, then it is the same as if `vm:100`, `vm:101` and `vm:102` would have > been > in a single positive resource affinity rule. > > +NOTE: If the HA resources of a positive resource affinity rule are currently > +running on different nodes, the CRS will move the HA resources to the node, > +where most of them are running already. If there is a tie in the HA resource > +count, the node with the alphabetically first name is chosen.
maybe something like: "the node whose name appears first alphabetically is selected" just a suggestion, though > + > However, suppose there are computationally expensive, and/or distributed > programs running on the HA resources `vm:200` and `ct:300`, for example, > sharded database instances. In that case, running them on the same node could _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
