This is the thread we discussed such change last year: http://forum.proxmox.com/threads/10110-New-network-configuration-with-bridge-vlan-interfaces
>From what I see, there were problems when using bonds and vlans. The main advantage of the current approach is that vlan tagging can be done by hardware, but that is maybe not really a big advantage? > -----Original Message----- > From: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Montag, 28. Jänner 2013 07:27 > To: Dietmar Maurer > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH] pve-common: PVE/Network: rework of > activate_bridge_vlan > > I don't get your idea. What do you mean? Why should there be unnecessary > untag/tag operations? > > Stefan > > Am 28.01.2013 um 06:25 schrieb Dietmar Maurer <[email protected]>: > > >> But setting the vlan on the bridge involve unnecessary tag/untag > >> operations which are avoided with the current setup. > >> > >> Please can you try to set the gvrp flag of the tap device instead > >> (after adding it to the bridge). Or is that a bad idea? > > > > Sigh - I am still wrong. There is simply no vlan tag on the tap devices. > > So if you use a private bridge, pve does not set any VLAN tags, and > > thus GVRP will not be involved. > > > > But this behavior looks correct to me? > > _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list [email protected] http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
