>>it generally seems that bridging, bonding and vlans all  together are not 
>>well tested and maintained. 

Yes, it's really a big mess in kernel code. 

Maybe for proxmox 3.0, could we try to have a look at openvswitch ?  (Don't 
know if it's works fine with openvz now...)



----- Mail original ----- 

De: "Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG" <s.pri...@profihost.ag> 
À: "Dietmar Maurer" <diet...@proxmox.com> 
Cc: "Alexandre DERUMIER" <aderum...@odiso.com>, pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com 
Envoyé: Vendredi 22 Février 2013 13:52:44 
Objet: Re: [pve-devel] new bridge code doesn't work with redhat kernel 

Hi, 

Am 13.02.2013 18:56, schrieb Dietmar Maurer: 
>> -----Original Message----- 
>> From: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG [mailto:s.pri...@profihost.ag] 
>> Sent: Mittwoch, 13. Februar 2013 13:38 
>> To: Dietmar Maurer 
>> Cc: Alexandre DERUMIER; pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com 
>> Subject: Re: [pve-devel] new bridge code doesn't work with redhat kernel 
>> 
>> Am 13.02.2013 11:53, schrieb Dietmar Maurer: 
>>>> I don't have too much time to test it, So I rollback to old code for 
>>>> now, works 100% for me. 
>>> 
>>> I just reverted the patch. Please test if it works again. 
>>> 
>> OK i'll keep my patch then local. 
> 
> BTW, did you saw the recent patches on the bridge list? 

Mhm might be a try - but i think you and i won't like to include it in 
our kernels... it generally seems that bridging, bonding and vlans all 
together are not well tested and maintained. 

Stefan 
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel

Reply via email to