>>Any ideas how we can avoid allocating an extra IP for the dhcp server? Some >>users just have >>a few IPs, so we do not want to waste any of them? >>The problem is the same with your bridge suggestion?
Yes, As far I known, you need an extra ip for each network/subnet where you want to offer ips. (Indeed some users have a few ips, I don't known if we can setup some kind on only extra internal ip for dhcp in the same network (ip not owned by user)? ----- Mail original ----- De: "Dietmar Maurer" <[email protected]> À: [email protected], "Alexandre DERUMIER ([email protected])" <[email protected]> Envoyé: Mardi 27 Août 2013 14:20:47 Objet: dnsmasqd needs extra ip I current use the following for dnsmasq: $cmd = "dnsmasq --no-hosts --strict-order --bind-interfaces --interface=$iface --except-interface=lo --domain=${dhcpd_domain} --dhcp-range=${dhcpd_first},${dhcpd_last},${dhcpd_mask},8h --dhcp-host=$net->{macaddr},$net->{ip} '--dhcp-ignore=tag:!known'"; The problem is that I need to specify an IP for the tap (inside the client network), else dnsmasq complains dnsmasq-dhcp: DHCP packet received on tap111i0 which has no address Any ideas how we can avoid allocating an extra IP for the dhcp server? Some users just have a few IPs, so we do not want to waste any of them? The problem is the same with your bridge suggestion? _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list [email protected] http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
