>>But in that case it make no sense to setup arp on the external interface, so >>we can simply skip that step? Yes, exactly, in this case, no neep arp in this case.
>>All hetzner/ovh configuration I saw so far have routing information for those >>addresses, so we can extract network/netmask from there? 2 possibility --------------- 1) you setup 255.225.255.255 netmask for guest, and gateway is himself. 2) you setup the real netmask for guest (/30 for example), so in this case the proxmox host should have an ip in the /30 and guest use this ip as gateway. ----- Mail original ----- De: "Dietmar Maurer" <[email protected]> À: "Alexandre DERUMIER" <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Envoyé: Mercredi 28 Août 2013 09:58:50 Objet: RE: [pve-devel] [PATCH 2/2] improve arp setup > so packet is routed through proxmox host. But in that case it make no sense to setup arp on the external interface, so we can simply skip that step? > This is exactly the same setup with ovh or hetzner, guest gateway is the > proxmox host(or guest himself with /32mask), because guest network is != > external router. All hetzner/ovh configuration I saw so far have routing information for those addresses, so we can extract network/netmask from there? _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list [email protected] http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
