>>I am not sure why we want to modify well defined CPU feature sets? Instead,
>>we can simply use
>>'qemu64' for win 8.1?
I thinked that you had switch from qemu64 to kvm64 because of cpu
family,model,stepping values ?
I don't known if
I check between both in cpu.c
difference are
qemu64
------
.level = 4,
.vendor = CPUID_VENDOR_AMD,
.family = 6,
.model = 6,
.stepping = 3,
.features[FEAT_8000_0001_ECX] =
CPUID_EXT3_LAHF_LM | CPUID_EXT3_SVM |
CPUID_EXT3_ABM | CPUID_EXT3_SSE4A,
kvm64
-----
.level = 5,
.vendor = CPUID_VENDOR_AMD,
.family = 15,
.model = 6,
.stepping = 1,
So qemu64 have more features, but kvm64 have newer cpu definition.
Don't known what is better for windows 8.1?
----- Mail original -----
De: "Dietmar Maurer" <[email protected]>
À: "Alexandre Derumier" <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Envoyé: Vendredi 15 Novembre 2013 07:30:44
Objet: RE: [pve-devel] [PATCH] add win81 ostype and enable +lahf_lm cpu flag
needed for this os
> see
> http://forum.proxmox.com/threads/16206-Windows-Server-2012-R2-and-
> 0x0000005D-Error
I am not sure why we want to modify well defined CPU feature sets? Instead, we
can simply use
'qemu64' for win 8.1?
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
