Am 13.01.2014 07:54, schrieb Alexandre DERUMIER:
>>> QinQ vlan tagging.
> 
> can somebody explain me how qinq works exactly ?  (I'm reading cisco doc, but 
> I'm not sure to understand how tagging is working exactly)

this should explain it:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.1ad


> ----- Mail original ----- 
> 
> De: "Andrew Thrift" <[email protected]> 
> À: [email protected] 
> Envoyé: Lundi 13 Janvier 2014 01:33:24 
> Objet: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH] Virtual vlan tagging to bridge interface 
> 
> 
> FYI we are using vlan tagging on bridges with Proxmox in production for over 
> a year now, initially on 2.6.32 kernel and then on 3.10. We are using Intel 
> gigabit and 10gigabit adapters. 
> 
> 
> We posted the patches to the list a few months back, I believe these are very 
> similar to Alexandre's patches. We have a more complex config in that we are 
> also doing bonding and QinQ vlan tagging. 
> 
> 
> Our setup looks like this: 
> 
> 
> eth0,eth1,eth2,eth3---->bond0---->bond0.101---->vmbr0---->vmbr0.201<----tap 
> interface 
> 
> 
> 
> That is using an outer tag of 101 and an inner tag of 201. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 7:59 AM, Alexandre DERUMIER < [email protected] > 
> wrote: 
> 
> 
> 
>>> If alexandre’s patch don’t work with any devices it isn’t really 
>>> interesting because it addressing other functionality and devices. I 
>>> checked the patch and it use the same problematic part with eth*, wifi* and 
>>> >>bond* check which fails with virtual devices like gre, ipsec,.. 
> 
> What do you mean by "don't work with any devices" ? 
> 
> My patch is to manage vlan tags on the bridge, not eth interface. 
> 
> eth0---->vmbr0<------tap interface 
> 
> vlan are tagged on tap interfaces plugged on vmbr0, with new "bridge" cmd. 
> (like an access port on a cisco switch) 
> and vlans are allowed to pass through eth0.(like a trunk port on cisco 
> switch) 
> 
> So I think it should work with gre,ipsec,...(But I don't have tested it yet) 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Mail original ----- 
> 
> De: "Johannes Ernst" < [email protected] > 
> À: [email protected] 
> Envoyé: Vendredi 10 Janvier 2014 18:16:30 
> 
> Objet: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH] Virtual vlan tagging to bridge interface 
> 
> 
> 
> Thus, it’s a configuration issue and NOT a kernel issue. 
> 
> If alexandre’s patch don’t work with any devices it isn’t really interesting 
> because it addressing other functionality and devices. I checked the patch 
> and it use the same problematic part with eth*, wifi* and bond* check which 
> fails with virtual devices like gre, ipsec,.. 
> 
> Am 10.01.2014 um 17:18 schrieb Dietmar Maurer < [email protected] >: 
> 
>>> Sure? Do you have additional information? I think it's not correct and it 
>>> works! 
>>
>> We tested that a few times (and failed), so nobody is keen to test that 
>> again. 
>>
>> We currently try to use the new bridge VLAN features - that looks more 
>> promising (see patches from Alexandre). 
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> pve-devel mailing list 
> [email protected] 
> http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel 
> _______________________________________________ 
> pve-devel mailing list 
> [email protected] 
> http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> pve-devel mailing list 
> [email protected] 
> http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel 
> _______________________________________________
> pve-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
> 
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel

Reply via email to