Why not use qcow2 format over generic NFS? It will give you shapshot-rollback features and I don't think that with much worse speed than these features on ZFS level.
But on my experience, NFS storage for VMs is bad idea: it causes huge latencies under load, leading to chashes. If you want ZFS-based shared storage, then ZFS over iSCSI is your choice. 25.07.2016 21:42, Andreas Steinel wrote: > Don't get me wrong. Of course NFS works fine, but it is a "stupid" file > storage. It would be great to have snapshot/rollback features from the > Proxmox PE gui. The ZFS commands should be executed transparently on the > storage, so that you can have a "virtual" ZFS that can be used in a cluster. > > I really miss a cluster filesystem with snapshot capability (the one from > Proxmox VE) which can be used by "ordinary" users. _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
