On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 07:11:45AM +0200, Dietmar Maurer wrote: > > On October 10, 2016 at 1:04 PM Fabian Grünbichler > > <f.gruenbich...@proxmox.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > this introduces two new options for non-volume mount points, > > modeled after the way we define 'shared' storages: > > - boolean flag 'shared': marks a mount point as available on > > other nodes (default: false) > > - pve-node-list 'nodes': limits the 'shared' parameter to > > specific nodes (default: no limit / all nodes) > > Is it really worth to add a node list for each mount point? I wonder > if we can have a node list per guest instead?
Would also be an option - less fine grained, but also less clutter and less work to set up. I'll wait or some more feed back (also regarding the naming) and then send a v2, unless a better option comes up. In the long term, it would IMHO make sense to move to a different way of configuring bind mount points altogether - set them up as a (special?) storage that contains a whitelist of source paths and mapping to nodes (only possible as root) and then allow regular users to configure them in the GUI. It might also be nice to implement some kind of "shared folders" feature for the VMs along with that (could reuse the "storage" definition) - but that's a different can of worms. _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
