On Wed, 4 Jan 2017 16:52:56 +0100
Fabian Grünbichler <[email protected]> wrote:

> 2: e.g., one interesting possibility would be a "minimal downtime"
> offline migration for ZFS-only guests that works with a two-phase zfs
> send/receive, because this would combine the nice properties of the
> current offline migration on ZFS (keeps snapshots!) with the added
> benefit of vastly reducing down time for most use cases.
> 
This would also benefit the new ZFS-over-iSCSI plugin I am currently
working on since this plugin uses directly mounted LUN's instead of
using libiscsi.

Apart from this the above solution would also work with MPIO.

-- 
Hilsen/Regards
Michael Rasmussen

Get my public GnuPG keys:
michael <at> rasmussen <dot> cc
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD3C9A00E
mir <at> datanom <dot> net
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE501F51C
mir <at> miras <dot> org
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE3E80917
--------------------------------------------------------------
/usr/games/fortune -es says:
"If that man in the PTL is such a healer, why can't he make his wife's
 hairdo go down?"
                -- Robin Williams

Attachment: pgp9jgAbO02RJ.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel

Reply via email to