On 3/5/20 10:51 AM, Dominik Csapak wrote: >> + # wipefs location: >> + # - Debian 9: /sbin/wipefs >> + # - Debian 10: /usr/sbin/wipefs >> + # The symlink from /sbin to /usr/sbin makes this work for fresh PVE > > the comment is odd:
working with a mix of usr merged and unmerged systems makes one go odd ways ^^ > pve6 here: > > # which wipefs > /sbin/wipefs > > # dpkg -S /sbin/wipefs > util-linux > > # dpkg -L util-linux > /sbin/wipefs > /usr/share/bash[...] > /usr/share/man[...] for the record: just use it without any path and be usr merge save. We have a lot of precedents using run_command with the binary names only, relying on $PATH to be sane - if that would become a problem in any way (when the system then probably isn't to usable either) we would enforce the our-chosen-sane-PATH value in run_command as central place anyway. _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
