Yeah! I have that impression too. Even the glusterfs plugin in the web interface doesn't work. Plante of times I have to use fstab to mount a gluster volume with two servers.
Em sáb, 24 de jul de 2021 08:30, Alex K <[email protected]> escreveu: > On Tue, Jul 20, 2021, 13:56 Alex K <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Anyone has any feedback to share regarding the support of multiple > > glusterfs server nodes? > > > > May I assume that glusterfs is not used in production with Proxmox where > more then two servers in hyperconverged setup is a common use case? It is > my impression that Proxmox is more inclined towards ceph with glusterfs > being somehow a second class citizen. Correct me if I am wrong. > > Thanx > > > > On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 3:44 PM Alex K <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Resending as it seems screenshots are not accepted. > >> > >> Regarding the *backup-volfile-servers* option when attaching gluster > >> volumes, I tried to configure it from UI (DC -> Storage -> Add) as below > >> though it seems it is not supported. > >> I am getting the error: > >> > >> Parameter verification failed. (400) > >> *server2*: invalid format - value does not look like a valid server name > >> or IP address > >> > >> How can one define more than one backup server as below? > >> > >> backup-volfile-servers=node1,node2 > >> > >> This is useful when having a 3 replica or more gluster server setup. > >> > >> Thanx, > >> Alex > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 2:01 AM alexandre derumier <[email protected] > > > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Le vendredi 09 juillet 2021 à 10:16 +0200, Mark Schouten a écrit : > >>> > Maybe easier to use the metric-server-service for that? > >>> > >>> it's more than we don't have some values currently, like vm real host > >>> cpu usage. (including vhost-net process for example), > >>> > >>> or real host memory usage (for windows, when ballonning is enabled, we > >>> don't see the zero filled memory by windows, so reserved on the host). > >>> > >>> My patches to get values from cgroups are already applied, > >>> but they are not yet exposed in pvestatd. > >>> > >>> > >>> I would like also to improve pve-ha-manager vm migration based on the > >>> hosts load too. > >>> > >>> > >>> I just need time to rework on this ^_^ > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> pve-user mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user > >>> > >> > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user > _______________________________________________ pve-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
