It's not made very clear from the documentation. I assume there are good technical reasons why the cluster traffic would be impacted.
Afaik, proxmox leverages corosync which can leverage multicast for the cluster checks. I don't think it can be badly impacted by LACP but something to keep in mind. There is this old thread with a similar discussion : https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/cluster-lacp.90668/ On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 4:10 AM Marco Gaiarin <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm doing some experimentation on a switch that seems does not support > LACP, > even thus claim that; is a Netgear GS724Tv2: > > > https://www.downloads.netgear.com/files/GDC/GS724Tv2/enus_ds_gs724t.pdf > > data sheet say: > > Port Trunking - Manual as per IEEE802.3ad Link Aggregation > > and 'IEEE802.3ad Link Aggregation' is LACP, right? > > > Anyway, i'm experimenting a bit with other bonding mode, having > (un)expected > results and troubles, but in: > > https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Network_Configuration#_linux_bond > > i've stumble upon that sentence: > > If you intend to run your cluster network on the bonding > interfaces, then you have to use active-passive mode on the bonding > interfaces, other modes are unsupported. > > What exactly mean?! Thanks. > > -- > Molti italiani sognavano di vedere Berlusconi in un cellulare, > prima o poi... (Stardust®, da i.n.n-a) > > > > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user > > _______________________________________________ pve-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
