hum... thank you Michael... I'll check out... I saw in a website or in a list, I really don't remember, that VMWare don't reveal any benchmark and even deny data about this matter... Is that true? Is there some tool that we can use to perform a benchmark, with graphics and others stuff??
Thanks again 2013/8/24 Michael Rasmussen <m...@miras.org>: > On Sat, 24 Aug 2013 11:20:37 +0000 > Gilberto Nunes <gilberto.nune...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> sorry... what I found is just feature comparison.... and nothing about >> performance... >> if someone can help, I will appreciate... >> > There is a master thesis from Oslo University College available here. > Do remember though that the virtualization development is moving fast > and this thesis compares ESXi 5.0 KVM 1.4 so much can have change > since that. You could, however use the test on newer versions: > > "Abstract: > The main purpose of this thesis is to compare the performance overhead > of the virtualization infrastructures KVM and VMWare. All the > experiments are carried out by using the Red Hat Enterprise Linux(RHEL) > Operating System version 6.1. The study focuses on the performance of > disk I/O operations, memory operations and CPU operations. The > benchmarking tools used are Iozone for disk I/O, Ram Speed for memory > and UnixBench for CPU. First a set of benchmarking tests are carried > out by using a Bare Metal installation of RHEL 6.1 on a Dell Poweredge > R710 server. Next the exact same set of benchmark tests are run after > installing RHEL 6.1 on a single virtual machine running on KVM on the > same server. Finally VMWare ESXi 5.0 is installed on the server and > RHEL 6.1 is installed on a single virtual VMWare machine. In this way > the performance overhead of the two virtualization infrastructures KVM > and VMWare is measured and compared. Each benchmarking test is run in > each of the three cases sufficiently many times to produce > statistically significant results. The VMWare I/O disk performance is > mostly from 20 to 30% better than KVM, with a few exceptions. And > generally the VMWare I/O performance is 10-15% less than the Bare Metal > performance. The memory performance overhead is relatively smaller. KVM > performs better than VMWare for block sizes of 4MB and less, while the > results show the opposite for block sizes larger than 4MB. When testing > pure ALU usage, there is almost no virtualization overhead. There was > some overhead for the other UnixBench CPU tests and in all these cases > VMWare was performing better than KVM. Our general conclusion is that > the virtualization overhead is less for VMWare than for KVM." > > https://www.duo.uio.no/handle/10852/34900 > > -- > Hilsen/Regards > Michael Rasmussen > > Get my public GnuPG keys: > michael <at> rasmussen <dot> cc > http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD3C9A00E > mir <at> datanom <dot> net > http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE501F51C > mir <at> miras <dot> org > http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE3E80917 > -------------------------------------------------------------- > Avoid the Gates of Hell. Use Linux > (Unknown source) > > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@pve.proxmox.com > http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user > -- Gilberto Nunes www.konnectati.com.br Fundação Softville Rua Otto Boehm, 48 - Sala 04 (47) 3431-7344 (47) 9676-7530 Skype: gilberto.nunes36 _______________________________________________ pve-user mailing list pve-user@pve.proxmox.com http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
