On Tue, 16 Dec 2014 02:27:28 PM Dietmar Maurer wrote:
> AFAIK that code is not stable. But I will try to compile and include it for
> testing.


Thanks, appreciated.

I've done testing with ceph-fuse for VM hosting and it works, but performance 
is pretty bad. It would be interesting to see if the kernel module is much 
better.


Ultimately I'd like to see if it is a viable alternative to rbd direct. Our 
testers run snapshots up and down a lot, and snapshot restore on rbd is just 
to slow. But with CephFS I can use qcow2, which is much faster.

So production servers could run off rbd and test vm's off cephfs
-- 
Lindsay

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
pve-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user

Reply via email to