On 3/21/18 1:51 PM, Wolfgang Link wrote: > >> So does this mean that all those processes are sitting in a "queue" waiting >> to execute? wouldn't it be more sensible for the script to terminate if a >> process is already running for the same job? >> > No because as I wrote 15 is default, but we have many user which have longer > intervals like 1 day. > If you would quit the process you would skip one day. >
But that could simply be solved that only one process may be queued, i.e., if one is active a the next starts the it waits. If the next(-next) start and the former still waits then it just exists immediately. With this we'd never miss a sync cycle and have a maximal queue of 1, not 500 or more... _______________________________________________ pve-user mailing list pve-user@pve.proxmox.com https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
