Hi Sam, I think I am guilty of that regression during the iget<->iget456 conversion.. I think your new version captures the essence of the vfs semantics for 2.4 and 2.6. I wonder why a dcache run did not capture this behavior.. Sorry about this. thanks, Murali
On 4/5/07, Sam Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Apr 4, 2007, at 8:22 PM, Sam Lang wrote: > >> Do you think that we should go with your patch plus a "#ifdef >> PVFS2_LINUX_KERNEL_2_4" wrapper to control whether it returns NULL >> or res on that one line? > > Yeah. Sounds good to me. I can commit unless there are other > objections. > Went ahead and committed them. -sam > -sam > >> >> -Phil >> > _______________________________________________ Pvfs2-developers mailing list Pvfs2-developers@beowulf-underground.org http://www.beowulf-underground.org/mailman/listinfo/pvfs2-developers
_______________________________________________ Pvfs2-developers mailing list Pvfs2-developers@beowulf-underground.org http://www.beowulf-underground.org/mailman/listinfo/pvfs2-developers
