I was wondering if this is an expected operation:
I did pvfs2-cp from client to server, ctrl-c'd the client operation, and
it killed the server.
The client log looks like it handled everything correctly, and
de-registered all the memory and etc. that it should have done. Not so
lucky on the server I think, this is the log from the MD server, which
is the only one that went down, the Data servers are all still up.
-- using CVS head from last week, and openIB, client is ppc64, servers
are x86_64 --
[D 10:27:55.956330] PVFS2 Server version 1.5.1pre1-2006-08-30-144459
starting.
[E 10:28:22.852931] src/proto/PINT-le-bytefield.c line 573:
lebf_decode_req: imp
roper input buffer size: 0x63fc8c != 0x63fc58 + 80
[E 10:28:22.853531] [bt] /usr/local/sbin/pvfs2-server [0x429895]
[E 10:28:22.853541] [bt]
/usr/local/sbin/pvfs2-server(PINT_decode+0x1ac) [0x
4277ec]
[E 10:28:22.853549] [bt] /usr/local/sbin/pvfs2-server [0x40edfc]
[E 10:28:22.853561] [bt] /usr/local/sbin/pvfs2-server(main+0x11d4)
[0x4101e4
]
[E 10:28:22.853568] [bt] /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xda)
[0x2aeb3b668
4ca]
[E 10:28:22.853576] [bt] /usr/local/sbin/pvfs2-server [0x40d5ba]
(END)
Is this the expected operation when a client 'dies'? I've seen in the
past that simply killing the pvfs2-cp process hasnt caused server's to
go down, but maybe I'm wrong?
-- Kyle
--
Kyle Schochenmaier
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Research Assistant, Dr. Brett Bode
AmesLab - US Dept.Energy
Scalable Computing Laboratory
_______________________________________________
Pvfs2-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.beowulf-underground.org/mailman/listinfo/pvfs2-users
