> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 04:43:29AM +0000, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:56 PM, Roger <[email protected]> wrote:
>....
>> Amazing.  Results almost the opposite of what one would expect!  But to those
>> that understand what is going on here, easily explained but still easily
>> over-looked.
>
>Not at all surprising.  The Hauppauge devices tend to be
>"cost optimized" solutions without all the well designed
>(pre)amp front end that a higher end TV has to insure
>that it can properly handle both low and high signal levels.
>Those without the (expensive) RF meters have to just
>try a few things to see how it works for them.
>
>And while I would have pulled a pad (attenuator) out of the
>toolbox rather than using a splitter, the result is about the
>same.
>
>Glad to hear you got it all working.

Ah! That's the name of the item I was looking for the past day!  Just couldn't 
remember it.

Thanks!

-- 
Roger
http://rogerx.freeshell.org/
_______________________________________________
pvrusb2 mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.isely.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pvrusb2

Reply via email to