I am implementing the camera access and still haven't got the code completed enough to see the images retrieved by the camera, so I cannot perform a complete test to your patch. If there is anyone else that can test it, please do so.
In the mean time, if I am able to test your patch, I will send you the results. Hugo Costelha On Wednesday 09 November 2005 16:19, Luc Saillard wrote: > On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 04:11:07PM +0000, Ivor Hewitt wrote: > > Luc Saillard wrote: > > >On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 10:49:27AM +0000, Hugo Filipe Costelha De Castro > > >wrote: > > > > I guess the question is what do other drivers use for auto-shutter? 0 > > seems like a sensible choice, after all why else would you be setting a > > zero exposure. > > Here the patch, can you test it before commit ? > > # svn diff pwc-v4l.c > Index: pwc-v4l.c > =================================================================== > --- pwc-v4l.c (revision 89) > +++ pwc-v4l.c (working copy) > @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ > .id = V4L2_CID_EXPOSURE, > .type = V4L2_CTRL_TYPE_INTEGER, > .name = "Shutter Speed (Exposure)", > - .minimum = 1, > + .minimum = 0, > .maximum = 256, > .step = 1, > .default_value = 200, > @@ -699,7 +699,7 @@ > return 0; > case V4L2_CID_EXPOSURE: > c->value <<= 8; > - ret = pwc_set_shutter_speed(pdev, > 0, c->value); + ret = > pwc_set_shutter_speed(pdev, c->value?0:1, c->value); if (ret<0) > return -EINVAL; > return 0; > > > _______________________________________________ > pwc mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.saillard.org/mailman/listinfo/pwc _______________________________________________ pwc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.saillard.org/mailman/listinfo/pwc
