On 2010-08-05, at 2:28 PM, holger krekel wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 14:24 -0700, Sridhar Ratnakumar wrote:
>> On 8/5/2010 2:06 PM, holger krekel wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 13:46 -0700, Sridhar Ratnakumar wrote:
>>>>> I am trying to run py.test on a given module object dynamically.
>>>>>
>>>>> mod = __import__('company.foo.somemod')
>>>>> py.test.run(mod)
>>>>>
>>>>> A quick glance in the py.test source doesn't seem like a trivial thing.
>>>>> IPython introspection did not give me any clue either.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there a way to do this at all? I did try
>>>>> py.test.cmdline.main(['...']), but that accepts only file path, not the
>>>>> Python module object itself.
>>> there currently is no direct support for running tests in python modules.
>>> py.test basically always starts from the file system. Does it help you
>>> to try to fish the file from somemod.__file__ and pass this to
>>> cmdline.main()?
>>> You only expect it to collect tests of a single module, right?
>>> I guess we could add some more direct support for this if
>>> you continue to have the need (please create an issue if so).
>>
>> Hmm, __file__ is a workaround, but it seems to work fine for my use
>> case. I was just wondering if an API was exposed.
>>
>> I am happy with __file__ for now.
>
> What do you think about automating this lookup and allowing
>
> py.test.cmdline.main([module])
>
> maybe that's enough?
That might have helped, but then - just now, I rewrote some routines in my code
to simply rely on .py file paths instead of modules. This simplified the code a
bit. So now I have come to prefer file paths. :-) If I ever have the need for
running tests on module/class/collection-of-funcs objects, I will be sure to
open a feature request. Thanks.
-srid
_______________________________________________
py-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/py-dev
