holger krekel <hol...@merlinux.eu> writes: > > If we are to optionally allow pytest_funcarg__ naming with @pytest.factory > i wonder if renaming @pytest.factory to @pytest.funcarg would make sense > and contribute to the notion that pytest-2.3 just extends funcarg > facilities. The reason i favored @factory is that it really marks a > factory function whereas "funcarg" more denotes the argument in a test > or setup function. Moreover, the pytest-2.2 documentation already talked > about factories when refering to pytest_funcarg__ functions. > (And @funcargfactory seems a tad long to me). > > However, i can't claim to have much of an outside view so i am interested > in your and other opinions.
+1 for @pytest.funcarg (mostly because I like to grep for it) _______________________________________________ py-dev mailing list py-dev@codespeak.net http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/py-dev
