On 26 October 2012 21:19, Ronny Pfannschmidt <ronny.pfannschm...@gmx.de> wrote:
> i think just having the name setup will make people
> wonder about the teardown again
>
> if i correctly recall the name setup did
> cause people to misunderstand already
> (expecting a teardown of some kind)
>
> Unfortunately i cant think of a fit short name.
@pytest.autofixture, but I'd be -1 on that.
If the @pytest.setup shortcut is deemed required then a
@pytest.teardown shortcut could also be made for:
@pytest.setup
def generated_teardown_func(request):
request.addfinalizer(original_teardown_func)
I have no opinion on whether such shortcuts are useful, they are more
then one way to do things which makes me think they should not exist.
But if when talking to users and many examples show such usage as
common then maybe they should be considered. Personally I haven't
wanted a plain setup/teardown since funcargs so I tend to think they
are just people's resistance to change.
Regards,
Floris
_______________________________________________
py-dev mailing list
py-dev@codespeak.net
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/py-dev
