Though, users added with the transport isn't so different from users added from the standard client. It would look strange in the "real" client if some of the buddies are in a "transport" group. In most cases I think people prefer just to add them to the standard group, and if they are to be sorted this can be done with the real client and there will be no.
I guess it's hard to make this jabber-user-specific, though it would be quite neat. /Jonas Chris Carlin wrote: > I'd prefer to create a separate group for the transport buddies (the > yahoo_yt approach). > > I can imagine that sometimes I'll be accessing the SSI stuff from > outside of the transport, running an official AIM client or whatever, > and I wouldn't want to see the PyAIM-t buddies sitting in my already > organized Buddies group. I can imagine it would throw some people off... > > ~Chris > > On Sun, 9 Jan 2005, Daniel Henninger wrote: > >> You know what, I was all jazzed about getting groups to work between >> Jabber and AIM/ICQ Buddy lists. As it turns out, Jabber does not pass >> along the group to the transport, so it is not possible to add this >> functionality. =( So, the default groups as I've observed them in >> "real" >> clients are: >> AIM - Buddies >> ICQ - General >> >> Should I continue to try to put buddies here or should I go the route >> that >> the Yahoo transport goes and create a separate group that is effectively >> the transport's group. Yahoo's transport has somethng like... >> yahoo_yt or >> something like that. >> >> Daniel >> >> -- >> "The most addictive drug in the world is music." >> - The Lost Boyz >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> py-transports mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/py-transports >> > _______________________________________________ > py-transports mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/py-transports
