For that matter, if I run PyAIM or PyICQ over a wireless connection  
at half signal strength on a different machine from where ejabberd is  
running, it still runs plenty fast.

I don't understand what's going on..

Oh also:
otp R10B-9   for erlang  if that helps anything

Daniel

On Feb 1, 2006, at 8:19 PM, Chris Carlin wrote:

> Have you ever tested under ejabberd? Odd things had been happening  
> since I made that switch...
>
> I'm on gentoo with the following versions:
> dev-python/twisted-words-0.3.0 *
> dev-python/twisted-2.1.0 *
> dev-python/twisted-xish-0.1.0-r1 *
> dev-python/twisted-web-0.5.0-r1 *
> dev-python/twisted-conch-0.6.0 *
> dev-lang/python-2.4.2 *
>
> ~Chris
>
> Daniel Henninger wrote:
>
>> I can't imaging what that might be.  And again, I haven't seen a   
>> single difference on my side.  =/  I mean there's certainly a lot   
>> that changed between 0.6 and 0.7.  Wish I could see what you all  
>> are  seeing on my own server...  =/  Chris, what version of Twiste  
>> and  Python are you using?
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>> On Jan 31, 2006, at 5:51 AM, Chris Carlin wrote:
>>
>>> So I finally got around to switching from 0.6 to 0.7b and I  
>>> realize  now that I wasn't seeing precisely the problems Alexey  
>>> was  describing... but now I am!
>>>
>>> Again, this is with ejabberd, which seems to delay the  
>>> transport's  initialization in a way that jabberd2 did not. I now  
>>> see that 0.7b  delays messages in ways that 0.6 didn't, though I  
>>> have no personal  experience between 0.7b's behavior in jabberd2  
>>> versus ejabberd.  Ahhh, orthogonalities....
>>>
>>> Anyway, another observation: often my messages will be sped up  
>>> when  a message is incoming. If I am seeing 20 second delay on  
>>> outgoing  messages and the other person sends a message, they  
>>> will often  receive one message immediately.
>>>
>>> I haven't a clue what this means. Could it be some sort of   
>>> buffering you're not thinking about? Maybe some buffering  
>>> feature  of twisted that changed during the 0.6-0.7b upgrade?
>>>
>>> ~Chris
>>
> _______________________________________________
> py-transports mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.modevia.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/py-transports
>
>

Reply via email to