Greetings, For the record. Should one want to increase the length of the prefix used for 'hashing' the xdb xml files according to username/JID, currently the first two characters form the subdirectory, does it suffice to change all occurences of "0:2" with "0:4" say?
XDB.PY: Three occurences of "file[0:2]" (PyMSNt 0.11) HOUSEKEEP.PY: One occurence of "file[0:2]" (PyMSNt 0.11); (Auxiliary helper file) All the file handling logic is kept in XDB.PY at the moment, which makes this increased length-of-hash change straight forward. Sincerely, David From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 11 00:47:11 2006 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (James Bunton) Date: Tue Jul 11 00:47:16 2006 Subject: [py-transports] PyMSNt Hashed xdb directory files - hash length In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On 11/07/2006, at 7:43 AM, David E Freitas wrote: > Greetings, > > For the record. > Should one want to increase the length of the prefix used for > 'hashing' the xdb xml files according to username/JID, currently the > first two characters form the subdirectory, does it suffice to change > all occurences of "0:2" with "0:4" say? > > XDB.PY: Three occurences of "file[0:2]" (PyMSNt 0.11) > > HOUSEKEEP.PY: One occurence of "file[0:2]" (PyMSNt 0.11); (Auxiliary > helper file) > > All the file handling logic is kept in XDB.PY at the moment, which > makes this increased length-of-hash change straight forward. > > > Sincerely, > > David Yes, that's correct. --- James
