On 08/06/06 at 16:06 +0200, Hylke van der Schaaf wrote: > James Bunton wrote: > > On 01/06/2006, at 9:21 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >>> From time to time, pymsnt starts using a lot of CPU for about 30s, while > >> it doesn't use that much the rest of the time. No message is logged > >> during this time period. > >> > >> Those high load periods can be seen on > >> http://apijab.apinc.org/munin/apinc.org/apijab.apinc.org-cpu.html > >> pymsnt is nearly the only thing running on this system, and I've > >> verified that pymsnt was the cause for the high CPU usage. > >> > >> Sometimes, it's longer or shorter that 35s : > >> 13:08:38 -> 13:09:17 > >> > >> > >> What does QNG mean ? > >> What could be the source for this ? > >> I'm using pymsnt r168. > >> > >> I'm available for testing/debugging if needed. > > > > > > :| > > > > That's not good. Has it just started doing it recently? > > QNG is just a ping. It shouldn't have anything to do with it. > > > > Garbage collection maybe? > > > > Anybody got any ideas? > > I would guess garbage collection. > How is the memory usage of python when this happens? How much memory is > in the system? how much is used by python, how much for buffers, how > much swap is used? > > If python has to garbage collect on things that where swapped out this > can cause a high load.
I didn't have python's memory usage specifically, but there was a lot of memory available, and no swap used. Maybe python starts garbage collecting even if there's still some memory available ? Anyway, it hasn't done it again since then, so I'm not sure ... -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 9 00:43:13 2006 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam Thorsen) Date: Fri Jun 9 00:43:35 2006 Subject: [py-transports] pyaim-t Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I'm using pyaim-t with ejabberd. When I add a contact from one IM client connected via the transport, the contact appears to be added successfully. However, the client corresponding to the contact added displays no authorization dialog. Is this the expected behavior from AIM? $15.00 reward for help with this problem: http://guruza.com/question/87/reward-15.00 Thanks, -Adam Thorsen From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 9 01:00:53 2006 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Daniel Henninger) Date: Fri Jun 9 01:01:01 2006 Subject: [py-transports] pyaim-t In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> *chuckle* Why the $15 reward? Anyway, what client is the person on the other end (not using pyaim) using? It is possible to set up your client to auto-authorize all requests, which would prefer the authorization dialog. There's nothing specific about the way pyaim requests auth that should cause this. Daniel On Jun 8, 2006, at 8:43 PM, Adam Thorsen wrote: > I'm using pyaim-t with ejabberd. When I add a contact from one IM > client connected via the transport, the contact appears to be added > successfully. However, the client corresponding to the contact > added displays no authorization dialog. Is this the expected > behavior from AIM? > > $15.00 reward for help with this problem: > http://guruza.com/question/87/reward-15.00 > > Thanks, > -Adam Thorsen > _______________________________________________ > py-transports mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.modevia.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/py-transports
