=D Since we had discussed this here before, I wanted to forward this on.
Daniel Begin forwarded message: > From: Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: March 13, 2006 1:24:40 PM EST > To: Jabber protocol discussion list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Standards-JIG] Avatar Image Hashes > Reply-To: Jabber protocol discussion list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Daniel Henninger wrote: >> Hi folk! >> >> In all three of the avatar implementation JEPs, you are told to >> generate >> a hash of the "image data". Until now, we have operated under the >> assumption that this is a hash of the actual image data, not of the >> base64-encoded image data. However, after it was brought up on our >> list, it seems that this is not explicitly specified anywhere. So: >> >> 1. Are we indeed correct in thinking that it's a hash of the real >> image >> data, not the base64 encoded data? > > Correct. > >> 2. May I request that JEP-0008, JEP-0084, and JEP-0153 all receive >> minor >> updates to clarify this? > > Done. (I'm slow but thorough.) > > P > > - -- > Peter Saint-Andre > Jabber Software Foundation > http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.shtml > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFEFbjoNF1RSzyt3NURAsiXAJ9VhrKXX718GHbba87eeW2iWFOLpACfQYLK > sVqnk1W7D0cfBURylfalL4c= > =e+2u > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
