Wow =D That's a hell of a lot of use!!! Honestly, I'm not good at specing out such things or really even gauging anything like that. I'm not running my transports in any sort of big environment. I'm basically the only one that uses them. I'm aware of others who are running them apparantly successfully in larger installations, but I don't know them off the top of my head. Python is a tad weird about it's memory use so I would definitely keep an eye on that. I know one server admin set up PyAIMt alongside the c-based transport and let those "who were brave" try it out to see how they liked it and report back their feelings on it. You might want to try something like that and keep an eye on it. I'd be really interested in hearing your findings btw. Either way, I'm sorry I can't be of more help. Perhaps someone else on the list can share experiences?
Daniel On May 1, 2006, at 5:03 PM, Safford, Brian wrote: > Is anyone running PyAIMt in a production environment with thousands of > connections? > > We're currently running the aim-transport 'c' code transport and have > upwards of 4,000 concurrent connections spread across 12 jabberd 1.4.4 > processes on a single HP DL 380 G4 ( 2 CPU / 2GB RAM ). > > I'm curious how much more server capacity I'll need to convert > these to > PyAIMt. > > Thanks in advance, > Brian Safford > Electronic Data Systems > _______________________________________________ > py-transports mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.modevia.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/py-transports
